097 - Reducing marine turtle bycatch: the important role of regulatory mechanisms in the global roll-out of Turtle Excluder Devices

097 - Reducing marine turtle bycatch: the important role of regulatory mechanisms in the global roll-out of Turtle Excluder Devices

Latest version in this language: Version for electronic vote | Published on: 10 Sep 2020

CONCERNED that six of the seven marine turtle species are categorised as Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (the remaining species is data deficient), and that fisheries bycatch is recognised as a major threat to all seven species;

ACKNOWLEDGING that a proven tool exists for reducing marine turtle bycatch in shrimp trawls, namely the Turtle Excluder Device (TED), which reduces mortality of turtles and other marine megafauna by 97% (Eayrs, 2007), whilst increasing productivity of trawling operations by reducing damage to nets, reducing the crushing of the catch, and reducing fuel costs (Gillet, 2008);

RECOGNISING that the United States of America passed legislation in 1989 prohibiting the importation of shrimp harvested in a manner that may adversely affect sea turtles but offering an exception to the ban for the use of TEDs;

CONSIDERING that the Interamerican Convention for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles includes a provision for each member Country to take measures to reduce marine turtle bycatch, including the use of TEDs and corresponding training,

RECALLING previous IUCN Congress and General Assembly Resolutions and Recommendations, such as: Recommendation 5.140 Reversing the crisis of the decline in turtle survival (Jeju, 2012); Recommendation 17.47 Sea Turtles (San José, 1988), which recognised the importance of supporting the United States’ promulgation of TED regulations; Recommendation 19.61 By-Catch of Non-Target Species (Buenos Aires, 1994), requiring bycatch monitoring and mitigation; and Resolution 1.16 Fisheries Bycatch (Montreal, 1996) which expressed alarm at the slow progress in effectively tackling fisheries bycatch;

NOTING that of the countries that export wild-caught tropical shrimp to the European Union (EU), at least six countries have been identified as not using TEDs in their trawls, which is leading to the bycatch of tens of thousands of turtles a year (CRPMEM, 2017); and

WELCOMING the European institutions’ approval in 2019 of an amendment in the Fisheries Technical Measures that requires the mandatory use of TEDs for tropical shrimp trawlers fishing in European waters in the Western Atlantic and the Indian Ocean (European Parliament Committee on Fisheries Provisional Agreement PE636.188);

The IUCN World Conservation Congress, at its session in Marseille, France:

1. REQUESTS the Director General to raise awareness of the importance of adoption and implementation of TEDs in tropical shrimp fisheries in all relevant national, regional and international fora, and with national governments, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and regional fisheries management bodies;

2. ENCOURAGES the European Commission and EU Member States that import tropical trawl-caught shrimp, to work with exporting countries to support the implementation of effective turtle bycatch mitigation measures, such as the use of TEDs, including the provision of technical capacity and/or financial support;

3. CALLS ON the EU to adopt import regulations requiring the introduction and adoption of TEDs by all countries exporting wild-caught tropical shrimp to the European market;

4. URGES the EU to ban imports of tropical trawl-caught shrimp from countries that are not adhering to their own national regulations currently requiring the mandatory use of TEDs on shrimp-trawl vessels, thus engaging in dialogue with third parties to ensure alignment with the EU Regulation 1005/2008 to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU Regulation); and

5. CALLS ON corporations which purchase tropical trawl-caught shrimp to consider voluntary measures to ensure they are not contributing to marine turtle bycatch, for example by purchasing only those shrimp products that are certified for export to the USA, until other exporting countries have fully rolled out TEDs on all their tropical shrimp trawls.

Six of the seven species of sea turtles are classified as Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered according to the IUCN Red List and are found in CITES Appendix I. Bycatch is recognized as the main threat to this group of species (Wallace et al., 2013). According to a study between 1990 and 2008, more than 85,000 turtles were caught, "but due to the small percentage of fishing effort observed and reported (generally <1% of total fleets) this probably underestimates the true total by at least two orders of magnitude ”(Wallace et al., 2010: 1).

Shrimp trawling is generally considered as one of the least selective fishing methods because bycatch can compensate for shrimp catch by 20 to 1 or more (Eayrs, 2007). Shrimp trawlers in tropical regions of the world are especially problematic for sea turtles, as they are often accidentally caught by sharing the habitat with the target shrimp of these fisheries.

The turtle excluder device (TED) was developed in the 70s in the United States, reducing the mortality of turtles and other marine megafaunas by 97% (Eayrs, 2007), while increasing the productivity of trawling operations by reducing damage to the fishing gear, reducing the crushing of the catch, and reducing fuel costs (Gillet, 2008). Therefore, the Unites States passed legislation in 1989 that prohibits the import of harvested shrimp in a way that can negatively affect sea turtles, but offering an exception to those fisheries that use TEDs (Public Law 101-162, Section 609).

Meanwhile, the European Union, the main importer of shrimp in the world (FAO, 2018), does not require TEDs in the tropical shrimp fisheries from which they import, despite the fact that bycatch of sea turtles in shrimp trawls that do not use TEDs is estimated at around 7 turtles per fishing trip (Wallace et al. 2010: 1).

Of the countries that export tropical shrimp to the European Union (EU), it has been identified that at least six countries have no measures comparable to those in the US; these are: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Madagascar, Thailand, and Viet Nam; that between 2009 and 2014 exported an average of 121,000 tons of shrimp to the EU (FAO Globefish, 2015). These countries, with the exception of Viet Nam, have national legislation that requires the use of TEDs, but the regulations are not implemented properly (CRPMEM, 2017 (http://www.rapporttedeu.com/)).

The EU is party to many international conservation treaties and has further endorsed a range of international conservation oriented guidelines; many of which contain specific text that clearly outlines obligations to minimize harmful fishing practices, such as those that result in marine turtle bycatch, among these being the Sustainable Development Goals (eg Target 14.4 “By 2020 ... end … destructive fishing practices”) and resolutions in Conventions (eg. Convention on Migratory Species resolution 9.18 on Bycatch.).

In this motion we raise awareness of the problems associated with the lack TED implementation and we call on the European Union to work with exporting countries to support the uptake of effective mitigation measures for turtle bycatch, such as the use of TEDs. We also seek for industries that buy wild tropical shrimps, to consider voluntary measures to ensure that they do not contribute to marine turtle bycatch. And finally we ask IUCN to raise awareness about the importance of the adoption and implementation of TEDs in tropical shrimp fisheries.
  • Association Française du Fonds Mondial pour la Nature - France [France]
  • Fondation Prince Albert II de Monaco [Monaco]
  • International Fund for Animal Welfare [United States of America]
  • Marine Research Foundation [Malaysia]
  • Ministerio del Ambiente, Peru [Peru]
  • Ministère de l'Europe et des Affaires étrangères [France]
  • Natural Resources Defense Council [United States of America]
  • WWF - Deutschland [Germany]
  • Wereld Natuur Fonds - Nederland [The Netherlands]
  • World Wide Fund - Pakistan [Pakistan]
  • World Wide Fund for Nature - International [Switzerland]

Hosts