088 - Ecological connectivity conservation in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework: from local to international levels

088 - Ecological connectivity conservation in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework: from local to international levels

Latest version in this language: Version for electronic vote | Published on: 22 Sep 2021

ALARMED that fragmentation, habitat loss and climate change gravely threaten persistence of biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people, as detailed in the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) 2019 Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services;

AWARE that plants and animals move as part of life strategies, and that gene flow between different populations is necessary for long-term species persistence;

FURTHER AWARE that successful conservation requires interconnected ecological networks comprised of large-scale systems of core habitats (Protected Areas, Other Effective Conservation Mechanisms (OECMs) and other natural areas) connected by ecological corridors across intact and human-modified terrestrial, freshwater, intertidal, and marine environments, regardless of political borders, to sustain the ecological processes between plants, animals, and non-living components;

RECALLING over 20 related IUCN Resolutions adopted since 1996, including Resolution 6.087 Awareness of connectivity conservation definition and guidelines (Hawai‘i, 2016);

ALSO RECALLING that Resolutions 6.051 Ecological connectivity on the north coast of the Alboran Sea and 6.096 Safeguarding space for nature and securing our future: developing a post-2020 strategy (both adopted in Hawai‘i, 2016), as well as Resolutions 12.07 (Rev.COP13) The Role of Ecological Networks in the Conservation of Migratory Species and 12.26 (Rev.COP13) Improving Ways of Addressing Connectivity in the Conservation of Migratory Species adopted by the 13th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS COP13, India, 2020);

HIGHLIGHTING that CMS Resolution 12.26 (Rev.COP13) defined ecological connectivity as the unimpeded movement of species and the flow of natural processes that sustain life on Earth;

OBSERVING the commitment under Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 towards achieving well-connected systems of protected areas, and adoption of Decisions 14/1 Updated assessment of progress towards selected Aichi Biodiversity Targets and options to accelerate progress and 14/8 Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures adopted by the Fourteenth Meeting of the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP14, Egypt, 2018);

FURTHER NOTING ecological connectivity as part of the current draft of a new international legally-binding instrument for marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction;

ACKNOWLEDGING that since its entry into force in 1983, CMS has been providing the primary specialised intergovernmental framework for international cooperative efforts on issues of connectivity conservation;

AWARE of the proliferation of connectivity conservation plans, including for indigenous, urban and working lands, that would benefit from globally consistent guidance for their creation, implementation and reporting;

RECOGNISING the importance of careful design and management of interconnected ecological networks to ensure they support conservation goals and do not contribute to biodiversity loss through the spread of non-native and invasive species;

FURTHER RECOGNISING publication of IUCN ‘Guidelines for Conserving Connectivity through Ecological Networks and Corridors’; and

CONVINCED that these Guidelines and enhanced collaboration will deliver connectivity conservation solutions that reinforce current commitments and elevate the post-2020 global biodiversity framework to be progressive, inspirational, measurable and effective;

The IUCN World Conservation Congress, at its session in Marseille, France:

1. CALLS ON the Director General to clearly integrate connectivity conservation into the IUCN Programme 2021–2024, including formal/informal cooperation, enabling polices/mechanisms, and public/private sector engagement for funding and implementation;

2. RECOMMENDS that the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) engages across the Union and works with existing and new partners to advance connectivity conservation by:

a. exploring how to document connectivity issues between terrestrial, freshwater, intertidal and marine environments;

b. promoting information exchange and data collection for assessing, monitoring, and measuring ecological connectivity, and to enhance implementation of area-based and species-based commitments;

c. developing the evidence base, identifying and developing case studies and providing best practices and practical guidance to inform policies, laws, plans and operational instruments that support ecological connectivity and species range-shift due to climate change, while mitigating or preventing the unintended spread of invasive species;

d. providing technical and scientific expertise to identify key drivers, species, areas, ecosystems and processes, especially in indigenous areas, urban areas and working lands; and

e. supporting conservation efforts to maintain and restore connectivity;

3. CALLS ON Members to recognise the role of connectivity conservation in underpinning the planet’s life-support systems and in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the three objectives of the CBD, and relevant goals of other treaties and agreements, to promote and support the inclusion of connectivity conservation and international cooperation in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework and in other relevant initiatives such as the 2030 Agenda and the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021–2030;

4. FURTHER CALLS ON Members to promote use of the IUCN ‘Guidelines for Conserving Connectivity through Ecological Networks and Corridors’;

5. INVITES Parties to the CBD, CMS, the World Heritage Convention, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, and other treaties/agreements, to use these Guidelines and build synergies for establishing and implementing area-based and species-based targets of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework; and

6. RECOMMENDS that Parties to the CBD include appropriate goals, targets and indicators on connectivity conservation, including an indicator for migratory species, in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework and ensure that connectivity conservation is effectively addressed there via appropriate tools – for example, green infrastructure, international cooperation, and other implementation mechanisms.

This motion asks for the inclusion of Connectivity Conservation and International Cooperation in the development of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and other relevant initiatives, such as the Agenda 2030 and the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.

The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and its Aichi Targets address connectivity only in Aichi Target 11, in relation to protected areas. The IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that while the numeric components of Aichi Target 11 were on a path to being achieved, other important aspects of the target, including connectivity and the ecological representativeness of protected areas, have made little or no progress.. The assessment also stresses the need to include connectivity in future biodiversity targets beyond protected area measures, because of its key role in improving freshwater management, building sustainable cities, restoring habitats, maintaining and enhancing ecosystem services.

Connectivity conservation can be achieved only through international cooperation but, the current Strategic Plan for Biodiversity only calls for the establishment and implementation of strategies and actions at national level. Connectivity indeed provides a means by which countries and stakeholders can agree on common goals and shared responsibilities, coordinating their actions and cooperating across boundaries and sectors from the transboundary, regional and international levels.

Related Resolutions and other materials of the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) are: Res. 12.07 on The Role of Ecological Networks; Res. 12.26 Improving Ways of Addressing Connectivity and COP12 Info.Doc.20 on Migratory Animals connect the Planet: the Importance of Connectivity as a Key of Migration Systems and a Biological Basis for Coordinated International Conservation Policies

Related IUCN Resolutions are:
2016-102 Protected areas and other areas important for biodiversity in relation to environmentally damaging industrial activities and infrastructure development”; 2016-096 Safeguarding space for nature and securing our future: developing a post-2020 strategy; 2016-087 Awareness of connectivity conservation definition and guidelines; 2016-051 Ecological connectivity on the north coast of the Alboran Sea; 2016-067 Best practice for industrial-scale development projects; 2016-035 Transboundary cooperation in protected areas; 2012-037 The importance of nature conservation criteria in land-use planning policies; 2012-044 Implementing ecological restoration best practices in and around protected areas; 2012-056 Enhancing connectivity conservation through international networking of best practice management; 2012-086 Integrating protected areas into climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies; 2012.089 Dams and hydraulic infrastructure; 2012-149 Transboundary ecological corridors in the Western Iberian Peninsula; 2012-152 Enlarging and connecting transboundary protected areas for the Ecological Corridor of Northeast Asia; 2008-4.036 Best practice protected area guideline for ecological restoration; 008-4.061 The Great Ecological Connectivity Corridor: Cantabric Range – Pyrenees – Massif Central – Western Alps; 2008-4.062 Enhancing ecological networks and connectivity conservation areas; 1996-038 Ecological Networks and Corridors of Natural and Semi-Natural Areas
--
This motion focuses IUCN’s commitment to connectivity conservation, promotes understanding and application of consistent practices, and initiates enhanced collaboration to conserve and restore ecological connectivity of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments. It is premised on work by the WCPA Connectivity Conservation Specialist Group (CCSG) to produce guidance for “Safeguarding ecological corridors in the context of ecological networks for conservation”. An advanced draft of the guidance is currently undergoing a public global online consultation until 30 Sept. 2019 to gather diverse input to inform broad and effective applicability. The final version—planned for publication before the 2020 IUCN WCC—will serve as basis for this resolution.

The Guidance builds on over 20 years of work at IUCN to incorporate science into coherent large-scale conservation measures. Related resolutions include:
1) 2016-102 “Protected areas and other areas important for biodiversity in relation to environmentally damaging industrial activities and infrastructure development”
2) 2016-096 “Safeguarding space for nature and securing our future: developing a post-2020 strategy”
3) 2016-087 “Awareness of connectivity conservation definition and guidelines”
4) 2016-067 “Best practice for industrial-scale development projects”
5) 2016-051 "Ecological connectivity on the north coast of the Alboran Sea”
6) 2016-035 “Transboundary cooperation in protected areas”
7) 2012-152 “Enlarging and connecting transboundary protected areas for the Ecological Corridor of Northeast Asia”
8) 2012-149 “Transboundary ecological corridors in the Western Iberian Peninsula”
9) 2012-086 “Integrating protected areas into climate change adaptation and mitigation [...]”
10) 2012-056 “Enhancing connectivity conservation through international networking [...]”
11) 2012-044 “Implementing ecological restoration best practices [...]”
12) 2012-037 “The importance of nature conservation criteria in land-use [...]”
13) 2008-4.128 “Setting up networks of protected urban and periurban natural areas”
14) 2008-4.087 “Impacts of infrastructure and extractive industries on protected areas”
15) 2008-4.073 “Support the building of an ecological vision for the Amazon biome”
16) 2008-4.062 “Enhancing ecological networks and connectivity conservation areas”
17) 2008-4.061 “The Great Ecological Connectivity Corridor [...]”
18) 2008-4.036 “Best practice protected area guideline for ecological restoration”
19) 2008-4.035 “Strengthening IUCN’s work on protected areas”
20) 2004-3111 “Impact of roads and other infrastructure [...]”
21) 2004-3.050 “Integrating protected area systems into the wider landscape”
22) 1996-038 “Ecological Networks and Corridors of Natural and Semi-Natural Areas”

The 2016 IUCN WCC, by adopting Resolution 2016-087, invited IUCN Members and governments to focus attention on an advanced draft of existing guidelines for connectivity conservation, and to work toward development, designation, planning, and management of connectivity areas and networks. Efforts to establish these consistent global approaches have progressed since. Based on the advanced draft, a series of consultations was held in 2017 and 2018 by the CCSG. Drawing on feedback, collaboration among a group of lead authors and experts throughout 2018 and early 2019 resulted in this consultation draft intended to clarify and standardize approaches.
  • Association Les Amis des Oiseaux [Tunisia]
  • Canadian Council on Ecological Areas [Canada]
  • Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society [Canada]
  • Center for Environmental Legal Studies [United States of America]
  • Center for Large Landscape Conservation [United States of America]
  • China Biodiversity Conservation and Green Development Foundation [China]
  • Conservation International [United States of America]
  • Cornell Botanic Gardens [United States of America]
  • Fondation pour la Protection de la Biodiversité Marine [Haiti]
  • Fundació Catalunya-La Pedrera [Spain]
  • Fundatia Carpati [Romania]
  • George Wright Society [United States of America]
  • Haribon Foundation for the Conservation of Natural Resources [Philippines]
  • Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas [Brazil]
  • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development [Nepal]
  • International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation [Hungary]
  • International Crane Foundation, Inc. [United States of America]
  • International Fund for Animal Welfare [United States of America]
  • Nature Kenya - The East Africa Natural History Society [Kenya]
  • Naturschutzbund Deutschland [Germany]
  • Office fédéral de l'environnement [Switzerland]
  • Peace Parks Foundation [South Africa]
  • Rainforest Trust [United States of America]
  • Rewilding Europe [The Netherlands]
  • Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature [Jordan]
  • Royal Society for the Protection of Birds [United Kingdom]
  • SEO/BirdLife, Sociedad Española de Ornitología [Spain]
  • Sustainable Forestry Initiative, Inc. [United States of America]
  • The Corbett Foundation [India]
  • The Nature Conservancy [United States of America]
  • The Pew Charitable Trusts [United States of America]
  • The WILD Foundation [United States of America]
  • Wetlands International [The Netherlands]
  • Wildlife Conservation Society [United States of America]
  • Wildlife Trust of India [India]
  • World Wide Fund for Nature - International [Switzerland]
  • World Wildlife Fund - US [United States of America]
  • Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative [United States of America]

Hosts